Home  About  Helping Us  Contact  Mailing List 
Features: 

Abstracts of ABRI MonographsSeries 3  Aetherometric TheoryVol. III  The Electric Aether and the Structure of the ElectronIntroduction to Volume III of AToS (8 pages, 0.5 MB) Correa PN, Correa AN Excerpted from the first monograph of the volume.
The aetherometric analysis of de Broglie waves, as a function of input energy, is presented as a solution that is distinct from the classical and relativistic treatments of wave, momentum and energy functions. This monograph only addresses the photoinertial treatment, the electroinertial treatment being the subject of a followup communication. This monograph must be purchased before it can be viewed.
This monograph must be purchased before it can be viewed.

We examine the physical functions behind classical theory, Bohr’s neoclassical approach, and the most recent quark model of the electron, and propose an alternative model that finds the electron rest energy to have (1) fine and hyperfine structures that conserve mass, force, linear and angular momenta; (2) volumetric flux geometry and (3) a singular deformable topology that varies with states of motion. We determine the ring current (e τ_{k}^{1}) = 1.03074229*10^{3 }C sec^{1}, the wattage and rate of timeflow of the electron massenergy flux and its natural synchronization with the Timemanifold of the Aether lattice. We differentiate the topogeometric models of the (globular) photon and the (toroidal) electron brought out by aetherometric analysis, and suggest distinct torus geometries for the electroinertial and photoinertial flux configurations. We find that socalled “states of spin” present a cylindrical hypercoiled conformation of the photoinertial configuration, and that inertial acceleration may involve coniform hypercoiled transitions of the spinstate electron massenergy flux, that bridge between the distinct flux configurations. The anomalous magnetic moment (modified by the Landé factor g) is derived as a property of the hypercoiled conformations of the massenergy flux in the photoinertial configuration. The ‘spin state’ value of electric charge as a linear momentum is found to be
(g p_{e}) = λ_{e}(g W_{k}) = λ_{e}(λ_{h2 }υ_{k}) = λ_{e }W_{k2 }= 13.98664191 m^{2 }sec^{1 }
as opposed to the value of electric charge in the electroinertial configuration which is
p_{e }= λ_{e }W_{k }= λ_{e}(λ_{h }υ_{k}) = λ_{e }W_{k }= 13.97017654 m^{2 }sec^{1 }
We contrast, feature by feature, the aetherometric analysis of the electron massenergy flux with the most recent model proposed by quark theory (QED/QCD). In fact, no real fine or hyperfine structures are brought out by the latter, and we formally show that the determination of the electron mass sought, but missed, by QED is simply
m_{e }= h υ_{δe}/c^{2 }=∫= h /λ_{ce }c = (λ_{ce }p_{e }η/c^{2}) υ_{δe}= (λ_{x }p_{e}/c^{2}) υ_{δe}= λ_{e }
This monograph must be purchased before it can be viewed.
AS3III.5  Alpha  the fine structure constant and the hydrogen spectrum
Correa PN, Correa AN 
Previous redefinition of the electron massenergy as a closed toroidal flux now permits reexamination of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom and the identification of its fundamental errors,
strictly on the basis of an analysis of the kinetic energy of the permissible excited states of the electron. Foremost amongst these errors was the incapacity to separate the magnetic frequency of the
electron and associated kinetic energy, from the quantum frequency of the maximal kinetic energy of
the satellized electron in the hydrogen atom  which we find to be equivalent to the Hartree energy.
We identify two basic modes of kinetic energy storage  the bandflywheel and the precessionary flywheel  and provide the solution for magnetic Larmor precession of the electron torus in kinetic
states. These findings lead to a reappraisal of Eddington's fundamental physical ratios, and to the
correct and consistent redeterminations of the fine structure constant, alpha, presented in the metersecond, SI and CGS systems. Three analytical tests are constructed that compare the distinct aetherometric determinations of alpha with the conventional determination, and demonstrate how only the
former can be correct and consistent. These tests also predict the correct metersecond value of
electric charge and the exact hydrogen spectrum  with virtually no deviation from the observed localization of the photon emission bands.
AS3III.6  The Hartree Energy of Hydrogen and the Impedance of the "Vacuum"
Correa PN, Correa AN 
We identify the systematic errors in the determinations of the Bohr radius and the "classical
electron radius", and trace the inconsistencies of classical theory in its treatment of orbital electrons.
We demonstrate that the maximum kinetic energy of atomic hydrogen is the Hartree energy, and suggest that Hartreesize photons can only be emitted from hydrogen anion because of the special kinetic properties of the electron stack in the anion. Stack interactions are briefly discussed, and so is the
failure of the Millsian hydrino model. We show, physically and chemically, how no surplus energy
can be extracted from redox or acidbase reactions of hydrogen. We propose a Hartreeenergybased
formal demonstration and quantitation of the electric linear momentum property of charge, and a
corrected and complete system of Atomic Units. We provide errorfree, consistent dimensional analyses and exact metersecond equivalents of essential physical units and their quantities  the coulomb,
the ampere, the farad, the ohm, the henry, the joule and the watt. From first principles, we ascertain
the correct magnitudes and functions of electric permittivity, magnetic permeability and the impedance of "the vacuum". Analytical corrections are also made to our previous experimental work.
The impedance of "the vacuum" is treated as a massfree electric reaction to the displacement of charge
and photons, around which is formed a cluster of subbarrier (socalled "phonon") channels apparently
involved in "spontaneous fusion" events. A single 99.7 MeV ambipolar emission appears to be
responsible for the ohmic "vacuum" reaction, with a Tesla electric frequency of 3.396*10^{24}sec^{1}.
AS3III.7  Aetherometric Theory of Magnetism
Correa PN, Correa AN 
The aetherometric theory of magnetism proves that there is no independent physical reality
to the notions of a "magnetic energy" or magnetic monopoles. There is only electric energy associated with massfree and massbound charges, and in the case of the latter, this encompasses kinetic energy and massenergy. All forms of electric energy deploy constitutive magnetic waves and diamagnetic fields, but the energy associated with magnetism is electric, and not magnetic. Similarly, all the
magnetic frequency functions that we have identified and analyzed are found to be subtypes of electric (nonquantum or Teslan) frequency functions. In this context, we systematize the fundamental
rules and formalism of the aetherometric treatment of energy, power, and the quantum and nonquantum frequency functions of massbound and massfree charges. Even though we demonstrate
under what conditions in vacuo H and B have the same value 
μ = B/(2π H) = μ_{0AToS} ε_{0AToS} c^{2} = μ_{0} ε_{0AToS} c^{2}/2 = 1 H is also shown to be a measure of the linear density of superimposed wavelines, and always associated with the geometric mean velocity of a flux, be it kinetic or merely "kinemassic"; whereas B is shown to be a measure of the linear density of the radial lines of magnetic waves, and to depend on the characteristic magnetic waves of a charge. In other words, the only truly magnetic field functions are the Btype functions associated with the cyclotron frequency  the frequency of magnetic waves. The Htype functions are not truly magnetic, but 'electromagnetic' geometricmean functions of the superimposition of magnetic and electric waves. The two measures of socalled "magnetic fields" only coincide when one is dealing with massfree charges in vacuo, but they are distinct from the start when dealing with massbound charges. We also suggest that the correct measure of the linear density of magnetic wavelines in material media is B/2π, not B.
The analytical power of the aetherometric technique is underlined by a series of fundamental and practical determinations. Amongst the fundamental examples we highlight the linear density of "electromagnetic" wavelines with speed v = c in the electron massenergy given by its "intrinsic magnetic field" function H
H_{MBδe} = λ_{q}^{1} = 2.145946*10^{7} wavelines m^{1}and the exact determination of the B (true) magnetic field of the electron massenergy
B_{MBδe} = 2π F_{cycloe}/W_{k} = r_{h}^{1} = η/r_{q} = 2π η H_{MBδe} = 1.5873*10^{10} rad m^{1} =∫=On the practical side, we demonstrate how only the determination of the magnetic field B_{MBδe} in real gauss or tesla matches the detection at the gaussmeter of the angular velocity of the same magnetic field in read gauss or tesla; for the electron massenergy:
=∫= 2.29825*10^{5} (real) tesla
B_{MBδe} = r_{h}^{1} = 2π η H_{MBδe} = 2.298*10^{5} real tesla =∫∫= ω_{cycloe} = 2π F_{cycloe} =The gaussmeter does not exactly measure (real) gauss, or the reciprocal of radial length, but in fact it measures angular 'velocity' or frequency (read gauss), which we have noted is calibrated for the electron magnetic field wave. Indeed, the same numerical value of a cyclotron frequency can result in very different values of field B, depending upon whether the field B in question arises from a flux of massbound versus massfree charges. Lastly, we provide exact equivalences for the correct fundamental magnetic field units of the CGS and SI systems:
= 2.298*10^{5} read tesla
1 real gauss = 1 dyne rad/esu*c = 10^{5} newton rad/esu *c =∫= 6.90652 rad m^{1}and determine the angular cyclotron frequency of a magnetic field of 1 gauss for massfree charge with speed W_{v} = c:
1 real tesla = 1 newton rad/meter*amp = 6.90652*10^{4} rad m^{1} = 10^{4} gauss
ω_{cycloMFg} = c B = 2.0705*10^{9} rad sec^{1} = 1 dyne rad/esu
AS3III.8  Electroinertial Treatment of the de Broglie "MatterWaves", Particle Acceleration, and the Compton Effect
Correa PN, Correa AN 
We propose an electroinertial analysis of particle acceleration, tested with electrons or beta
particles, that makes superfluous the relativistic contention of mass increase with acceleration as
explanation for the asymptotic behavior of linear speed in the range of subluminal values. Likewise,
the hypothesis of a magnetic brake is also tested and found not to be satisfying. Instead, we propose
an electric brake sourced in the limitation that the massenergy of a chargecarrier imposes upon the
kinetic energy of the charge, as the very condition for the conservation of its mass and inertia, and
which operates at the level of the electric (voltage) wave of that kinetic energy. Charge and mass are
both found to be conserved. With this new method, the Bertozzi experiment and variants, as well as
the KauffmannBucherer beta decay experiments, are reanalyzed. New algebra is provided that treats
this electric brake without recourse to any relativistic transformations, while matching the empirical
data more closely than Special Relativity. Essentially, above a minimum limit found to lie at 284 keV,
the kinetic energy and voltage increasingly ("asymptotically") diverge from the applied field input
energy and voltage, up to a limit de Broglie wavelength given by the Comptonelectron wavelength.
Similarly, the de Broglie total energy of the accelerated particle is found to have half this wavelength
as its limit.
The implications of this analysis for the "elastic interaction" of an Xray photon and an electron in Compton scattering are brought out: foremost amongst them are the demonstration that Compton scattering depends upon the de Broglie total energy of the accelerated particle, and its corresponding wavelength; that the reemitted (outgoing) Xray photon also has an energy and a wavelength limit, and that the lowest limit wavelength of the outgoing Xray photons occurs with an incoming Xray energy just shy of 1.022 MeV:
λ'_{mean0180} = λ_{BT} + λ = 0.012Å + 0.012Å ≈ λ_{ce}Below or beyond the 0.012Å limit, and in full accordance with empirical data regarding Xray absorption, any incoming Xray "colliding" with an electron will generate a lepton and a "recoiling" nanoatom of dipositronium which will collapse into a gamma ray.
For anticathode Xray production by accelerated electrons, the same process of physical limitation of kinetic energy places a maximum Xray energy at 511 keV, with a minimum wavelength given by
λ_{min} = λ_{ce} = λ_{pmin}in full conformity with the DuaneHunt law.