A (Dis)conversation with ChatGPT on Science

by Paulo N. Correa, Alexandra N. Correa
Aurora Biophysics Research Institute

J Aetherom Res, Volume 4, Issue 4 (February 2025),  pp. 1-23

Article ID:   JAR04-04-01

View Full Text:  PDF

The Journal of Aetherometric Research is an open-review journal. If you wish to contribute a review of this article, please send your review to editor.JAR@aetherometry.com .

ABSTRACT We tested ChatGPT on selected scientific topics (the Biefeld-Brown Effect, the Reich-Einstein Experiment, Aetherometry) and had a riot of a time: the bot lies like any compulsory liar; it invents authors and papers or books as it sees fit; it falsifies what effects, theories or experiments are; it consistently produces the same false attributions; it libels honest, independent and credentialed researchers as pseudoscientists. It behaves like a poker player addicted to bluffing. It is Wikipedia on methamphetamines. One could fail to see what all the fuss was about, all the more so since the CCP DeepSeek drastically brought it down to scale. But thereby one glosses over its most fundamental role in social control: deception through false information. AI is simply a machinery of "intelligence warfare" designed to control the thoughts and feelings of every individual human being.