APPENDIX 8

Constant Recategorization of the Aetherometry Entry, and Related Harassments

This record comes from the history of the Aetherometry article itself.

Revision as of 18:49, 20 June 2005 Pjacobi {{disputed}}{{cleanup}} + merges ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:33, 20 June 2005 Pjacobi recat Newer edit →
Line 339:		Line 339:
	aetherometric discoveries		aetherometric discoveries
-	[[Category:Applied sciences]]	+	[[Category:Pseudoscience]]
-	[[Category:Philosophy]]	+

Revision as of 21:37, 20 June 2005 Helicoid ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:40, 20 June 2005 Pjacobi Reverted edits by Helicoid to last version by Pjacobi Newer edit →
Line 339:		Line 339:
	aetherometric discoveries		aetherometric discoveries
-	[[Category:Applied sciences]]	+	[[Category:Pseudoscience]]
-	[[Category:Philosophy]]	+

Revision as of 02:25, 21 June 2005 Natalinasmpf {{totallydisputed}} ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:28, 21 June 2005 Natalinasmpf rm protoscience category, clearly not, replacing it with pseudoscience instead Newer edit →
Line 653:		Line 653:
	encompass a philosophical account of the ethical and political 'choices'		encompass a philosophical account of the ethical and political 'choices'
	that are affected by each type of machine. No scientific or philosophic		that are affected by each type of machine. No scientific or philosophic
-	approach can escape being a part of one or the other type of machines.	+	approach can escape being a part of one or the other type of machines. {{dubious}}
-		+
-	[[Category:Protoscience]]	+
	== References ==		== References ==
Line 665:		Line 663:
	Vol 1: Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy</i>,		Vol 1: Nanometric Functions of Bioenergy</i>,
	Akronos Publishing, Toronto, Canada		Akronos Publishing, Toronto, Canada
		+
		+	[[Category:Pseudoscience]]

Revision as of 03:08, 21 June 2005 216.254.162.101 ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:08, 21 June 2005 Evil Monkey Reverted edits by 216.254.162.101 to last version by Evil Monkey Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{OriginalResearch}}		{{OriginalResearch}}
-	Article deleted by its sole author. No need to vote any further.	+	'''Aetherometry''' is a controversial concept developed by [[Paulo Correa|Dr. Paulo N. Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa|Alexandra N. Correa]], who advocate it as ''experimental and analytical work that ''replicates, revises and continues'' the scientific contributions of [[Nikola Tesla|N. Tesla]],
		+	[[Louis, 7th_duc_de_Broglie|L. de Broglie]], [[Wilhelm Reich|W.Reich]] and
		+	[[Rene Thom|R. Thom]] and [[Harold Aspden|H. Aspden]] concerning '''massfree energy'''. However, this is generally rejected by the [[scientific community]] as [[pseudoscience]] concerning [[energy]] applications, and has met with severe criticism and opposition, those who also note that the credentials of the developers of the theory are questionable. The concept itself, including "massfree energy" is a probable [[neologism]], which conflicts with [[quantum mechanics]]. The probable likelihood is that their research does not continue the contributions of Tesla and similar scientists at all.
		+

Revision as of 21:41, 21 June 2005 Natalinasmpf Yes, all of this is an extensive fraud, your plans to subvert Wikipedia to gain donations for your "new science" has backfired ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:48, 21 June 2005 Dragons flight rm criticism of PhD, see talk. Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	{{cleanup}}		{{cleanup}}
-	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] neologism conceived by [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]], who advocate it as ''experimental and analytical work that replicates, revises and continues'' the scientific contributions of revered figures such as [[Nikola Tesla]] concerning '''massfree energy''' and [[energy]] applications. However, this is generally rejected by the [[scientific community]] as [[pseudoscience]], and has met with severe criticism and opposition, those who also note that the credentials of the developers of the theory are questionable. The has shown extensive conflict with [[quantum mechanics]] as well as [[general relativity]]. It is of high probability the Correas are mere [[charlatans]]; they take the title of "[[doctor]]" but such credentials are probably [[fraud]].	+	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] neologism conceived by [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]], who advocate it as ''experimental and analytical work that replicates, revises and continues'' the scientific contributions of revered figures such as [[Nikola Tesla]] concerning '''massfree energy''' and [[energy]] applications. However, this is generally rejected by the [[scientific community]] as [[pseudoscience]], and has met with severe criticism and opposition, those who also note that the credentials of the developers of the theory are questionable. The has shown extensive conflict with [[quantum mechanics]] as well as [[general relativity]]. It is of high probability the Correas are mere [[charlatans]].

Revision as of 23:00, 21 June 2005 GangofOne Books ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:05, 21 June 2005 Natalinasmpf doesn't exclude them from possible (and most likely) charlatantry Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	{{cleanup}}		{{cleanup}}
-	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] neologism conceived by [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]], who advocate it as ''experimental and analytical work that replicates, revises and continues'' the scientific contributions of revered figures such as [[Nikola Tesla]] concerning '''massfree energy''' and [[energy]] applications. However, this is generally rejected by the [[scientific community]] as [[pseudoscience]], and has met with severe criticism and opposition, those who also note that the credentials of the developers of the theory are questionable. The has shown extensive conflict with [[quantum mechanics]] as well as [[general relativity]].	+	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] neologism conceived by [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]], who advocate it as ''experimental and analytical work that replicates, revises and continues'' the scientific contributions of revered figures such as [[Nikola Tesla]] concerning '''massfree energy''' and [[energy]] applications. However, this is generally rejected by the [[scientific community]] as [[pseudoscience]], and has met with severe criticism and opposition, those who also note that the credentials of the developers of the theory are questionable. The very concept of Aetherometry has shown extensive conflict with [[quantum mechanics]] as well as [[general relativity]]. There has been significant attempts by the Correas to gain followers for what they term as a "new [[scientific discipline": however, this is most likely [[charlatan|charlatantry]].

Revision as of 16:21, 24 June 2005 Natalinasmpf NPOV? we have to represent the scientific community, who deserve to be represented as mainstream science ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:39, 24 June 2005 William M. Connolley I don't think it true to say that mainstream science opposes this gumpf - it just ignores it. Kirlian photo, etc, aren't subfields of science - they are non science. Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
-	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[neologism]] coined by Dr. [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]] to describe their alternative scientific theories, which range over many scientific fields, ( such as [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[biophysics]]) and many controversial subfields, such as orgonomy,	+	'''Aetherometry''' is a [[neologism]] coined by Dr. [[Paulo Correa]] and [[Alexandra Correa]] to describe their alternative theories, which range over many scientific fields, ( such as [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[biophysics]]) and many controversial fields, such as orgonomy,
	Kirlian photography, aether theories, alternative theory of [[De Broglie]]'s matter waves, Le Sage-type theory of gravity and the aetherometric cancer project. Inspirations for it include interpretations of part of [[Nikola Tesla]]'s work that was never accepted by conventional science,		Kirlian photography, aether theories, alternative theory of [[De Broglie]]'s matter waves, Le Sage-type theory of gravity and the aetherometric cancer project. Inspirations for it include interpretations of part of [[Nikola Tesla]]'s work that was never accepted by conventional science,
-	and the theories of Dr. [[Wilhelm Reich]] and [[Gilles Deleuze]]. One should note however, that these are interpretations of their work, and not necessarily what would be their views. Other influences include Dr. [[Harold Aspden]]'s physical theories, and Dr.[[Eugene Mallove]]. However, this theory has met strong opposition from the [[scientific community]], who also note that often such theories lack [[peer review]], and allege such a theory as [[pseudoscience|pseuoscientific]].	+	and the theories of Dr. [[Wilhelm Reich]] and [[Gilles Deleuze]]. One should note however, that these are interpretations of their work, and not necessarily what would be their views. Other influences include Dr. [[Harold Aspden]]'s physical theories, and Dr.[[Eugene Mallove]]. However, this theory has largely been ignored as irrelevant by the [[scientific community]]. Often such theories lack [[peer review]] and may be [[pseudoscience|pseuoscientific]].