© CORREA&CORREA, 2001
Without critical breakthroughs in our understanding of basic natural
science, science, technology, as well as our understanding of cosmology
and biophysics will remain mired in their present-day bleak impasses.
It has become clear to us over the course of our long years of study that if
there is to be any escape found from the current impasses of science - from
what, to any eyes not yet wide shut, can only be assessed as a disastrous
relentless descent towards ever more stupid forms of barbarism, towards
ever diminishing resources, towards an ever increasing destruction of the
planetary environment - it is essential that we begin to grasp how utterly
misplaced and misconstrued are many of the most basic premises of
'modern' science: the premises of an entropic universe, of scarcity, of
inevitable exhaustion, of the limits placed by Man where nature did not
place them. But it is, in our view, nothing short of a futile, onanistic
exercise, to continue to engage - as is the common fashion - in imagining
that there is any way to move forward to a real grasp of the actual
functionings of energy without first returning to very basic science, to
fundamental observations that have been glossed over, and thus without
debunking those ideological obstacles which have served as impassable
impediments to our comprehension of nature. At the same time, it is
imperative that we methodically gather the experimental tools required for
this task, the very task which is taken up by Experimental Aetherometry.
Then, and only then, can we begin to assemble the understanding
demanded to engineer the new machines of the future.
Before we may productively dream to run, let alone fly, we must first
learn to walk. We must go back to the bench in order to begin to
systematically root out the insidious misconceptions which lie lodged in
the very heart of modern science - imbuing it with its prevailing logics of
quietism, cynicism and humanism.
For us, the beginning was understanding the observed variations in the
spontaneous discharge of electroscopes. Reich's interpretive analogy of
this behaviour, which relied on the electrical theory of the electroscope,
simply did not work in light of the fact that we could observe discharge
decelerations irrespective of the polarity of the charged electroscope. This
progressively led us to identify the kinetoregenerative phenomenon
reported in
AS2-01,
which proposes, based on both experimental and
theoretical considerations, that if we separate the gravitational from the
electrical interactions of the electroscope, a critical method of extracting
and analyzing gravitational interactions - which is completely novel - is
finally made possible.
To crack the kinetoregenerative phenomenon, we needed a new analytical
treatment of the problem of discharge arrest, so that we could go beyond
the mere determination of positional work and take proper account of the
variation in time observed for spontaneous electroscopic discharges. At
this juncture, we came back to Reich's critical yet completely neglected
teaching of the conversion of mass into length, and to what, in fact,
underlies it - that every form of inertial mass carries an underlying
graviton mass-equivalent wavelength. In
AS2-01
we provide the critical
mass-to-length conversion which can then be applied for the determination
of these wavelengths. Effectively, this method already carries the
implication of a periodic table of gravitons and provides both simple and
elegant mathematics for those determinations, including for the frequency
and wavelength of all gravitons.
From here, we propose a structure for the gravitational field, suggest a
way to determine the graviton, and provide the ratio of gravitons per atom
of matter. These elements are essential to the foundations for the new
Physics - and are now squarely in the public eye. Monographs
AS2-02,
AS2-06,
AS2-07
go on to utilize these basic tools. We introduce and
employ certain of the new aetherometric tools as well in the electrical
analysis of the behavior of the electroscope.
In monograph
AS2-02,
we propose - for the first time in the history of
basic science - an integrated theory of the action (electric and gravitic) of
the electroscope and its responses to different local energy fluxes - electric
fields, electromagnetic fields, and nonelectromagnetic-and-nonelectric
radiant energy, a form to which we have been referring as 'latent heat' or
'latent energy'. This unitarian theory of the electroscope is discussed
without any reference to orgone accumulators. The fact of the matter is,
Reich never systematically explored this essential groundwork - which
not only has proven to be absolutely critical in establishing the appropriate
tools for decoding the functions of the electroscope, but effectively
permitted us to apply such tools with precision to the ORAC anomalies.
Indeed, there is already an electroscopic or 'latent heat' anomaly in an
electroscope - irrespective of its charge polarity - when it is exposed to
the sun at midday. That Reich was not able to put his case forward in this
systematic manner and extract the principles of a new physics from his
accumulator studies, does not mean that the anomalies he discovered were
not real or that his discoveries should thereby have been discarded and
discredited. It is idiotic to blame someone for having discovered
something but not having fully understood it, especially if they understood
enough of the field of inquiry to have made the discovery to begin with.
But then, Reich's discrediting, in our view, has little to do with science
and far more to do with psychiatry and the challenge he posed to a century
that was taught to think only mechanistically and mystically, and does so to
this day.
In
AS2-02,
we examine the response of a pair of oppositely charged
electroscopes exposed diurnally to the atmosphere, and identify a set of
variables, some local, some non-local, that affect its behavior. We will not
go into all of them here, but will emphasize the important variable of solar
radiation which - at the zenith - instead of accelerating the leakage or
seepage rates, as ionization theory would predict it should, slows them
down or even brings them to complete arrest. This, coupled with the
observations surrounding the other four hidden variables we study in this
second monograph, has led us - through a series of intensive experiments -
to conclude that the electroscope responds to these variables in such a way
that we can integrate all of its responses through our unitarian theory of
the functions of the electroscope - capable of covering functions that are
electrical, electromagnetic, or which involve 'latent heat' or 'latent energy'.
Understanding the electroscopic theory enunciated in
AS2-02
was what
later, in Volume 2, permitted us to realize that there is a specific domain of
electromagnetic energy which mimics the gravitokinetoregenerative
phenomenon. In monograph
AS2-08
of Volume 2, we relate our
discovery that one can mimic the electroscope's response to 'latent heat' by
exposing it to a fairly strong radiation of LFOT (low frequency
optothermal) photons - particularly in the blue wavelength portion of the
spectrum. This is a critical piece of the puzzle, because that portion of the
atmospheric electromagnetic spectrum which emulates the electroscopic
action of 'latent heat' is produced precisely, so we argue, in response to the
electrical, massfree energy that may correctly be called 'orgone'.
Evidently, in the photo-induced kinetoregenerative effect, LFOT energy is
picked up by those trapped monopolar and massbound charges and
employed to feed their anti-gravitational work.
In monograph
AS2-03,
we compare the tools developed in
AS2-01
and
AS2-02,
and examine the fact that we can now measure local rates of
energy flow and thus the power that a local environment
can convey to trapped charges in order to sustain the kinetoregenerative
phenomenon. We contrast these tools with Reich's notion of an 'OP' (an
'orgonotic potential' at work in the electroscope) which, we show, was
nothing but the inverse of the notion of an electric neutralizing current.
The fact of the matter is that Reich's formulation of an 'OP' would never
have allowed him to escape from the theory of ionization. The tools he
required are precisely those we developed in
AS2-01
and
AS2-02:
they are
not electric, or at least not just electric, but also gravitational - and based
precisely on his experimental pendulum studies of gravitation. Had he
possessed or perfected such tools, the 'OP' would not have been of any
further interest to him. It would have been understood as simply the
reciprocal of the flux of a neutralizing current and nothing more.
We still needed a few more new tools, however, in this first step of our
experimental voyage. While Volume 1 of Experiment Aetherometry
concerns itself with the two anomalies (thermal and electroscopic)
discovered by Reich - their replication, their study and further
elaboration by using these new aetherometric tools and approaches - the
fact is that its focus lies still somewhere else, in the differentiation of the
physical effects characteristic of distinct energy forms. Invariably, this
translates into the laying down of a new methodology. The objective of
AS2-04
is to complete, with respect to the electroscope, the deployment of
this new methodology. Hence, we proceed to an experimental
demonstration of the different methods of charging an electroscope, which
have remained to this day very poorly understood - despite the pervasive
misconception that everything we have to learn from the electroscope has
long ago been gleaned. This leads us to examine other field responses of
the electroscope - for instance, to the human body or to its peripheral
radiant field. We formally demonstrate that the effect the human body has
upon the electroscope is neither electrical nor electromagnetic but is
precisely akin to the radiant effect of 'latent heat' we have been describing
in terms of kinetoregeneration. The capacity of the human body to draw
not just the kinetic energy of trapped charges but the charges themselves
upon contact is, for the first time, established and differentiated. Though
Reich discovered the depressing effect which the approaching human
body had upon the negatively charged state of the electroscope, he was not
able to put together the difference between the two actions and their
targets (field draw of kinetic energy, versus contact draw of electric
charges) in the context of an adequate theory of the charged states of the
electroscopes. This is the work of monograph
AS2-04.
Then, and only
then, were we in a position to move forward and apply the new
aetherometric tools to the thermal and electroscopic anomalies inside the
ORAC, together with the novel thermal methodology directly developed
in
AS2-05.
AS2-05
essentially addresses the ORAC thermal anomaly, whereas AS2-
06 addresses the electroscopic anomaly inside ORACs. In
AS2-05,
we first examine what we have termed the Reich-Einstein experiment, then
proceed fundamentally to test the thermal response of ORACs under direct
exposure to solar radiation. In the process, we put forth what is in essence
a new theory of blackbody radiation, buttressed by criticism of existing
blackbody radiation theories. We bring in other novel tools of
Aetherometry - which will be discussed later and more fully in Theoretical
Aetherometry - to 'put the last nail in the coffin', so to speak, by
demonstrating that, with accumulators exposed directly to the sun,
blackbody theory cannot account for the heat evolved inside the devices.
So this establishes a final proof that the ORAC thermal anomaly is real
and that the production of heat is taking place inside the device and is not
the result of passive absorption.
In
AS2-06,
using the tools of
AS2-01,
AS2-02,
AS2-03
and
AS2-04,
we
examine the electroscopic anomaly inside ORACs, not simply to validate
what Reich described as an arrest of the spontaneous electroscopic leakage
- but to formally demonstrate why the observed arrest is not electric. We
can no longer speak of electrical effects at this phenomenological level
because the spontaneous seepage is equally arrested inside the
accumulators, a fact which Reich never mentioned and which his theory of
the electroscope essentially ignored and had to ignore, since he refused to
accept - and thus failed to realize - that electroscopes charged with hair-
stroked rods were charged with negative electricity. Employing the new
tools of the previous monographs, we go on to quantify the degree of
'latent heat' accumulated inside an ORAC, and illustrate clearly that this
energy is significantly greater than the measured thermal energy, the
sensible thermal energy, inside the same device. These monographs,
taken together, prove the presence in the ORAC of two different energies -
one thermal and one latent - and suggest, through the methodological
concatenation of the reasoned experiments, that sensible thermal heat is
effectively derived from the latent insensible 'heat' trapped inside these
devices. In the thermal anomaly, 'latent heat' is converted into sensible
thermal heat or electromagnetic energy, whereas in the electroscopic
kinetoregenerative phenomenon, 'latent heat' is converted into
antigravitational work. This provides an explanatory model where the
thermal anomaly observed atop even simple Faraday cages is the direct
result of 'latent heat' preferably escaping the action of the local
gravitational field by flowing out through the top of the metal cage.
Finally, having pursued this stepwise examination of the foundations of
orgonometry, we are now in a position to ask what an 'org' (a
mathematical concept of an energy unit adequate to orgone, developed by
Reich) actually corresponds to, as a unit of aether energy. This leads us,
in
AS2-07,
into a further methodical study of the 'latent heat' of gases, the
so-called intrinsic potential energy of monoatomic and polyatomic gases,
and therefore to an in-depth study of 'latent heat'. The conclusion is that 1
org, in accordance with Reich's argument, is equivalent to approximately
10 joules. Comparative experiments are conducted which maximalize the
production of heat in black ORACs and minimize it in white ORACs. It is
by means of this comparative analysis that we are able to reveal the core
accumulation of 'latent heat' inside these devices, and correlate it with the
so-called intrinsic potential energy of molecules under STP conditions.
This completes the first experimental volume.
|